Trump to Declassify Amelia Earhart Files Amid Calls for Epstein Documents

In a surprising, perhaps, even wild, turn of events, former President Donald Trump has announced plans to declassify federal records related to aviation pioneer Amelia Earhart, whose mysterious disappearance in 1937 hasn’t really befuddle many people ever since.

At least, not as much as the Epstein files. The move comes as a response to growing demands for the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender whose connections to high-profile figures remain a source of controversy. Online discourse has erupted in response to Trump’s announcement, with many commentators expressing skepticism about the relevance of the Amelia Earhart files.

On blue sky, comments such as “Why the hell would the US government even have secret documents with regards to Amelia Earhart?” and “No one cares about the Amelia Earhart files, humanity still hasn’t even located where her plane went down!” highlight the frustration among those who see the focus on Earhart as a distraction from more pressing issues, particularly the Epstein case.

Critics have been particularly vocal about the timing of the announcement. Some commenters have mockingly suggested that Trump may be using Earhart’s legacy to divert attention from the Epstein scandal, with one quipping, “If I release the Amelia Earhart files, will you finally shut the f— up about the Epstein files??” In the realm of social media, this discourse reached a fever pitch, with users inundating platforms with both humorous and critical posts.

One viral comment read, “Amelia Earhart died because she was a crappy pilot who did things unsafe. This has been the opinion of any aviation expert for 80 years.”

Post by @lordkeynes42.bsky.social — Bluesky

Another referenced the chaos surrounding Trump’s presidency: “Another of Trump’s memory farts. This is getting comical.” The announcement has provoked a mixed reaction across social media platforms, with some users pushing for a renewed investigation into Earhart’s legacy—arguing for a Hollywood portrayal of her story—while others have derisively suggested that the focus on Earhart is a thinly veiled attempt to sidestep accountability for ongoing legal matters involving Epstein.

As the debate continues, the public is left questioning not only the contents of the declared Amelia Earhart files but also the underlying motivations behind their release at a time when many are demanding transparency concerning more critical and contemporary issues.