By Breaking Editor 
Ryan Schwank, a former attorney and instructor at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) training academy, delivered explosive testimony before Congress, alleging that the agency’s training programs instruct new recruits to disregard constitutional protections. Schwank, who resigned earlier this month, stated that he received “secretive orders” to design a curriculum that effectively removes any requirement to uphold the Constitution.
During the congressional forum, Schwank described the training structure as “deficient, defective, and broken,” emphasizing that essential classes meant to instill an understanding of constitutional duties were removed from the curriculum. His remarks were met with immediate attention, drawing widespread support from various social media platforms, where users lauded his courage in bringing these claims to light.
“I swore an oath to uphold the Constitution when I joined ICE. I followed it when I resigned,” Schwank asserted, further accusing the agency of misleading both Congress and the public about its training protocols. His allegations raise pressing concerns about the legality and morality of ICE operations, particularly in light of current debates surrounding immigration enforcement and civil liberties.
Supporters of Schwank, including various legal and activist groups, have commended his bravery in coming forward, framing him as a hero for whistleblowers. His testimony substantiates already growing scrutiny of ICE’s practices, with most Americans supporting the abolishment of the organization.