By Breaking Editor 
Recent social media discussions have intensified scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to a purported “Shadow Commission” on the September 11 attacks, highlighting the invitation extended to Ghislaine Maxwell. Claims emerging from the Epstein files suggest that investigative journalist Edward Jay Epstein, unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein, invited Maxwell to join this secretive group in 2003.
Documents referenced in these claims include two specific file numbers, EFTA00578730 and EFTA00580430. The first file reportedly contains correspondence proposing Maxwell’s inclusion in the commission, while the second, dated just a week after the 9/11 attacks, poses a provocative question: “Where is the real pilot?” The emergence of these files has spurred renewed debate about the official narratives surrounding both Epstein and the events of 9/11.
Social media users have speculated that Epstein’s proximity to influential figures earlier in his life, coupled with allegations of him working for Mossad, has raised questions about his potential leverage over high-profile political leaders, including former President George W. Bush. Some users have posited that Epstein’s alleged blackmail capabilities may have contributed to what has been described as a “sweetheart deal,” referencing a non-prosecution agreement reached in 2008 concerning charges of sex trafficking.
The existence of a “shadow commission” has drawn skepticism, with critics questioning the legitimacy and transparency of the official 9/11 Commission led by the Bush administration. Many are now calling for renewed investigations into both the commission’s findings and Epstein’s potential role in influencing or observing key events surrounding the September 11 attacks. As public interest grows, calls for accountability and clarification of these connections have escalated, igniting conspiracy theories and calls for further governmental scrutiny.
Representatives from the relevant authorities have yet to respond to these allegations or confirm the authenticity of the files in question, leaving open questions about the extent of Epstein’s influence and the broader implications for U.S. political history.